Royal Declaration Revealed

    Main purpose of this information is to give you history that has not been re-written, but just left out of our education.  Please understand England prior to 1776 was deeply entrenched in a protestant government.  Rome was considered a superstitious and idolatrous religion.  Now after 1776 it was legal(mass) what was illegal(mass) in England in America because of freedom of religion.  At the time of the American revolution 2% of the population were Catholic and 98% Protestants.  We have to ask who benefited from the American revolution??  What was consider superstitious and idolatrous religion now had equal footing to practice their superstitious and idolatrous religion.  Now lets fast forward to 2012.  What was the smallest denomination, is now the largest denominationThe American revolution was not about tea and taxes, it was about religion.  Now the true motive has been erased from history, the real perpetrators go unknown.  But the reality of 1776 was, full freedom for Catholics to practice their superstitious and idolatrous religion  in the colonies,  without constant obstructions, as long has they were under the protestant government of England.  Now below is the Royal Declaration out of the Catholic Encyclopedia.
Remember the King or Queen had to agree to this oath to start their reign.
1912 Catholic Encyclopedia

"I, A. B., by the grace of God King (Or Queen) of England, Scotland and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God, profess, testify, and declare, that I do believe that in the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper there is not any Transubstantiation of the elements of bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ at or after the consecration thereof by any person whatsoever: and that the invocation or adoration of the Virgin Mary or any other Saint, and the Sacrifice of the Mass, as they are now used in the Church of Rome, are superstitious and idolatrous.  And I do solemnly in the presence of  God profess, testify, and declare that I do make this declaration, and every part thereof, in the plain and ordinary sense of the words read unto me, as they are commonly understood by English Protestants, without any evasion, equivocation, or mental reservation whatsoever, and without any dispensation already granted me by the Pope, or any other authority or person whatsoever, or without any hope of any such dispensation from any person or authority whatsoever, or without thinking that I am or can be acquitted before God or man, or absolved of this declaration or any part  thereof, although the Pope, or any other person or persons, or power whatsoever, should dispense with or annul the same or declare that it was null and void from the beginning." 

My comments:  Now lets ask our self's.  What part of the Constitution and bill of rights protest the Roman Catholic Church.   What part of government calls the Roman Catholic Church a superstitious and idolatrous religion?  If you understand the Royal Declaration you understand the motive and who was behind the American revolution of 1776.  I want to REPEAT!!!  History has not been rewritten, the 200 years prior to 1776 has just been swept out of the minds and is not taught to any degree.  Ask your self dear reader.  Did you know before 1776 in England and in the American colonies that Catholics could not hold office and the superstitious and idolatrous mass could not be said in public??  Quote from Samuel Morse 1835: The food of Popery is ignorance.  Ignorance is the mother of papal devotion.  Ignorance is the legitimate prey of Popery.  Ignorance:  The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uniformed.  99% of Americans have never heard of the  Royal Declaration.  Now you know the most important link to the American revolution.  As Paul Harvey would of said: "Now you know the rest of the story".
The below is the comments from the Catholic Encyclopedia 1912 edition.
on the Royal Declaration

My Comments: Dear Reader remember this is being written in the Catholic Encyclopedia, so naturally this is there view on the
Royal Declaration.

The terms of the document are important, for even the extravagant and involved wording of the "long rigmarole" at the end added much to the sense of studied insult conveyed by the whole formula. Not only is the Mass stigmatized as idolatrous, but a false statement of Catholic doctrine is implied in the reference to the "adoration" of the Virgin Mary and the saints "as now used in the Church of Rome", while the existence of a supposed dispensing power is assumed which the Catholic Church has never asserted. What added still more to the just resentment of Catholics at the continued retention of the Declaration was the consciousness that, in the words of Lingard, it owed its origin "to the perjuries of an imposter and the delusion of a nation". The formula was no one drafted by a Parliament in its sober senses. With the object of excluding Catholics from the throne, the Bill of Rights, after the deposition of James II in 1689, exacted of the monarch a profession of faith or "Test". The test selected was one which already stood in the statute book, and which was first placed there during the frenzy excited by the supposed Popish Plot of 1678. It was amid the panic created by the fabrications of Titus Oates, that this Test was drafted (not improbably by himself), and it was imposed upon all officials and public servants, thus effectually excluding Catholics from Parliament and positions of trust. By a curious inversion of history the declaration which was drawn up in 1678 to be taken by every official except the king, had come two hundred years later to be exacted of the king and of no one else. Although statements have been made contending that the substance of the Royal Declaration is older than Titus Oates' time, an examination of these earlier formula shows little to support such a conclusion (see a full discussion in "The Tablet", 13 Aug., 1910). A brief account of these formula, and of the attempts which were made in 1891 and subsequent years to abolish or modify the Royal Declaration, has already been given in the article OATHS. It will be sufficient to cite here the terms of the new Declaration which was formally carried by Mr. Asquith's Government in August, 1910, in time to relieve King George V from the necessity of wounding the feelings of his Catholic subjects by a repetition of the old formula. In virtue of Mr. Asquith's "Accession Declaration Act" the brief statement, which now replaces that quoted above, runs as follows:

My Comments:  The above Royal Declaration(top of page) was said up to August, 1910.  The below is what is the oath the King or Queen says to begin there reign after 1910.

"I, N., do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God, profess, testify and declare that I am a faithful Protestant, and that I will, according to the true intent of the enactments to secure the Protestant Succession to the Throne of my realm, uphold and maintain such enactments to the best of my power."

"Grand Design Exposed"
Chapter 16
304 to 306

     Biding her time for a global holy war, the whole world is being set up for a massive purging, and sadly, America has been chosen to do the work. And by that same system of Babylonian Romanism that brought on the religious terrors of Europe of not too long ago, that were so bloodcurdling real, par excellence, with its Crusades, Inquisition, and instruments and tribunals of torture.  No other organization in all of known history has ever employed such continued methods of cruelty and barbarity. And they were implemented many years before there were people known as 'Protestants'. Terrifying people out of their wits as a means to keep them docile and adhered to her absurd false doctrines, cries loudly that something is terribly wrong. No wonder she can boast to be the largest religion in the world. She exercises control over her victims either by superstitious bondage or stark terror!  And Romanism has the utmost advantage - teaching that it is not morally wrong to deceive, brutally kill and butcher to accomplish her goals.  Not only true followers of Christ, but most of humanity, can't even begin to comprehend such cruelty, and are horrified to believe that you have to whip and terrorize another into submission in order to keep them in the fold.  Our Lord never so much as hinted at such a practice.  To systematically torture another human being, is nothing less than Satanic.

     The terrified people that were fleeing the European Continent in masses, were fleeing the oppressions and persecutions of Romanism. Even the afflicted people of England who were fleeing to America, were fleeing from nothing less than a Church that had inherited and retained all the corrupt doctrines and severe intolerance from the Mother Church of Rome; but denied the pope as its head. Can it be conceived by any stretch of the imagination, that the ragged, tattered, tired, frozen, shoeless, feet bleeding soldiers of George Washington, defending what they believed to be the liberty and freedom established by their forefathers, who had fled the terrors of Romanism in the OId World would have so severely suffered and died for the detestable purpose of reestablishing Romanism in the New World - unless they had been coerced or deceived into believing otherwise??

     The American people were lied to and deceived right from the outset. The issue of independence was advocated by nobody, and a little earlier John Adams said that it would not have been safe even to discuss it.  But as Patriots gained control, colonists were bullied into accepting separation from England, or literally losing all they had ever worked for and being chased out of the country.(Loyalists) For the majority of colonists, even though they loved England, there really was no choice; they had to stay. Every calculated move of the Patriots was done with caution. Each step had to be developed, before going on to the next. This kept the American people deceived of their true intentions, to completely separate from England. This way, the general population stayed calm with the least amount of opposition.  That is, until another crisis could be provoked, giving the propagandists new material to work with, so to clamor against abuses, and for giving support anew in favor of total separation from such a tyrant as Mother England.

     The idea of establishing a Catholic colony among the Protestant North American colonies, with the intention of later separating it from England, was more than just a suspicion, as far back as year 1630, when the First Lord Baltimore George Calvert and the Jesuits began scheming for the Catholic Maryland colony. As briefly mentioned in Chapter 13, page 239, the suspicion was so great and so real at the time, that a convincing answer of rebuttal had to be given to it before the emigrants could leave England.  As doggedly as the Jesuits worked to subvert and reestablish the Roman Church in the nation of England, there can be no doubt that it was always their full intention to do the same also in England's North American colonies.  That's pure logic.  And as obvious proof, in spite of the colonies being adamantly Protestant, who were ruled by the mother country who was also rigidly Protestant, the Jesuits relentlessly pursued to establish themselves, not just in Maryland, but Pennsylvania and New York, or anywhere else they could get a foothold.  Freedom to function and flourish has always been to the Jesuits and the wealthy Catholic nobility an absolute top priority goal - bar everything else.

     But the reality was, full freedom for Catholics to function in the colonies just could never happen without constant obstructions, so long as they were under England's rule. The solution then, was to prod a movement that 'appeared' to be motivated by the Protestant colonists; that would cleanly separate them from the mother country. This was just the type of work Freemasonry was meant to do. And so well was this 'appearance' accomplished, that Protestant colonials didn't even know what was happening even at the time of the Revolution - and very few know yet, even today. Because the true motive has been erased from history, the real perpetrators go unknown.  It is only by recognizing that the American Revolution was Roman Catholic and Jesuit inspired, who worked through Freemasonry, as bizarre as that may sound today, do you grasp the full significance of the many elusive and strange improprieties that seemed to occur during those times