"The Origin Of Dispensational
New Futurist/Zionist Theology
Tracking the Beast from the Synagogue to the Vatican
Solving the Mystery of BABYLON THE GREAT
Author Edward Hendrie
Establishing Zionist Churches Chapter 27
By clicking on the book to the right.
You can read the whole book on line
|Rom 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.|
Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
|In the1800's Zionist
Jews needed financial backing from the United States or
their plan for a New Israel would fail. In the 1800's the
United States was a predominately Christian Country.
Any attempt to subjugate Palestine and reestablish Israel as
a state in that region would be met with resistence from the
then politically influential Christian quarter in the U.S. The
Christians in the U.S. posed a political roadblock to
funding the new state of Israel. The Zionists
knew that they had to nullify the anticipated Christian
resistance to their Zionist plan. They decided that
the Christian theology in the Protestant churches must be
changed to favor an Israeli state. They had ready
theologians to perform this duty in their Jesuit auxiliary.
(providing supplementary or additional help and support)
The Jesuits decided upon a plan to inject a theology into the Protestant churches whereby the Jews would be restored to their lost prominence via the rebuilding of the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. There would be a reinstatement of animal sacrifices and the ordinances of the Old Testament law. Christ would return and rule from the temple during a millennial reign. Thus, the Christians would look upon the reestablishment of the Jewish state of Israel in Palestine as a fulfillment of the prophecy. They, consequently, would not offer any political resistance but rather would be encouraged to support Israel.
The Catholic Church also wanted to steer the Protestant theology away from identifying the pope as the antichrist. The idea was to point the attention of Protestants to a future antichrist and away from the antichrist sitting on the throne in Rome. So the Jesuits tried to frame a new “Christian” eschatology that accomplished both concealing the antichrist and reestablishing the Jews to prominence in God’s prophetic plan. The Jesuits and their fellow travelers cobbled together a disjointed patchwork of bible passages that served to lay the groundwork for this new futurist/Zionist theology.
Ultimately, this new theology was introduced in the seminary schools controlled by crypto- Jews. The witting and unwitting seminary graduates then introduced their new “Christian” theology into the Protestant churches throughout the world. This new theology is the basis for the Left Behind series of 16 religious novels, that have sold more than 65 million copies. The Left Behind series of books are also very popular movies that are heavily promoted in churches throughout the world.
Tens of millions of Christians were executed by the Roman Catholic Church during the dark ages because those brave witnesses for Christ believed that the pope was the antichrist. In fact, one of the foundational principles of the Protestant reformation was that the pope is the antichrist. This view is amply supported by the Holy Scriptures.
The change in the position of the Protestant denominations toward Rome was the direct result of a concerted campaign by agents of the Roman Catholic Church. One of the methods used by the Roman Catholic theologians was to relegate much of the book of Revelation to some future time. In 1590 a Roman Catholic Jesuit priest Francisco Ribera, in his 500 page commentary on the book of Revelation, placed the events of most of the book of Revelation in a period in the future just prior to the end of the world. He claimed that the antichrist would be an individual who would not be manifested until very near the end of the world. He wrote that the antichrist would rebuild Jerusalem, abolish Christianity, deny Christ, persecute the church, and dominate the world for three and half years.
Another Jesuit, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, promoted Ribera's teachings. Bellarmine was one of the most influential cardinals of his time. In 1930 he was canonized by the Vatican as a saint and “Doctor of the Church.” This Catholic interpretation of the book of Revelation did not become accepted in the Protestant denominations until a book titled The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty was published in 1812, 11 years after the death of its author.825 The author of that book was another Jesuit by the name of Emanuel de Lacunza.
William Kimball in his book Rapture, A Question of Timing, reveals that de Lacunza wrote the book under the pen name of Rabbi Juan Josaphat Ben Ezra. Kimball attributes the pen name to a motive to conceal his identity, thus taking the heat off of Rome, and making his writings more palatable to the Protestant readers. It is as likely that in fact the pen name was not a pen name at all, but rather Lacunza’a true identity as a Jewish Rabbi. It is possible that Lacunza was a crypto-Jew, who wrote the book under his true identity as a rabbi. One does not suddenly convert to Judaism and then become immediately so versed in that religion that one takes on the title “rabbi.” He must have had the learning of a Rabbi in order to write a book that contains knowledge of Judaism expected of a Rabbi.
It is notable that the book was not published by Lacunza himself, but by someone else eleven years after his death. Why would Lacunza go through such trouble and then not publish the book? Could it be that Lacunza was in a dilemma? The book was targeted to a Protestant audience, who would not accept a futurist theory from a Jesuit. So he knew he could not publish it under his true name. He had to publish under another name. Could it be that he had some concern about publishing the book, which would expose his true identity as a Jewish rabbi, and therefore he demurred on doing so? While that explains his actions, couldn’t he have simply used some other non-Jewish pen-name? There is no authoritative answer to that mystery.
Lacunza’s status as a rabbi is all the more believable when one considers the fact that he was a Jesuit and the Jesuits are a crypto-Jewish secret society. The first Jesuits were crypto-Jews. Ignatius Loyola himself was a crypto-Jew of the Occult Kabbalah. Jews were attracted to the Jesuit order and joined in large numbers. Ribera was a crypto-Jew. Lacunza would not be out of place as a Jewish Jesuit. Lacunza and Ribera being Jews would explain why they introduced the eschatological teaching of a return to the Jewish animal sacrifices. That doctrine gives the Jews primacy in God’s plan and relegates Christians to a prophetic parenthetical to be supplanted by the Jews during the supposed thousand year earthly reign of Christ.
Lacunza wrote that during a millennium after the tribulation the Jewish animal sacrifices would be reinstated along with the Eucharist (Note Chapter 20 "The Magical Transubstantiation of the Judaic Eucharist") of the Catholic Church. Lacunza has followed after Jewish fables and replaced the commandments of God with the commandments of men. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Titus 1:13. “They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.” (Titus 1:16 AV)
Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens; Heb 8:1 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul. Hebrews 10:39 makes explicitly clear that Christ fulfilled the requirements of the law by sacrificing himself once for sins for all time. If the blood of animals were sufficient to satisfy God there would be no need for him to come to the earth and sacrifice himself. “But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.” (Hebrews 8:6-7 AV)
God would not have us return to the weak and beggarly elements of the Old Testament law. But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain. Galatians 4:9-11 To teach such a thing is to blasphemously state that Christ’s sacrifice was imperfect and insufficient, and that therefore there is a need to reinstate the animal sacrifices. The Old Testament law was to act as a schoolmaster until the promise of Christ. God would have no reason to reinstate something that was intended to be in place only until he came to offer his own body as a perfect sacrifice. In Christ there is neither Jew nor Gentile; we are all one by faith in Christ. He is not going to divide us once again into Jew and Gentile. His church is his body which cannot be divided. Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul? 1 Corinthians 1:13. For a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand. Mark 3:24.
The bible makes clear that the old covenant is to vanish, being replaced by the new covenant of faith in Jesus Christ. “In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.” (Hebrews 8:13 AV) Why would God reinstate something which he has said would vanish away and in which he has had no pleasure? “In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure.” (Hebrews 10:6 AV)
Christ made his one sacrifice on the cross whereby those that believe in him are made perfect, consequently there will be no more offering of any kind for sin, period.
Christ has set us free from the law of sin and death in our flesh. Because of the weakness of the flesh it is not possible for us to obey God’s holy law. God must change our hearts through spiritual rebirth so that we are able to walk not after the flesh but after the spirit. Our obedience to God’s law does not earn salvation; it is a sign of salvation. We fulfill the righteousness of his law through the obedience of Jesus and his final sacrifice. Jesus’ righteousness is imputed to those who are chosen for salvation to believe in him. “And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification. Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. Romans 4:22 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: Romans 5:1 Those who try to use obedience to the law of God as a means to salvation are carnally minded, trying to earn salvation though the works of the flesh. The carnal minds that teach a return to the carnal sacrifices of the law are enmity against God.
Jesus blotted out the ordinances that were against us and nailed them to the cross. The law was only a shadow of Christ; he is the fulfilment of the law. Having fulfilled the law, Christ will not reinstate it.
The law of God was added after the promise given to Abraham. The law did not void the promise of God given to Abraham. The blessings of Abraham flow to all who believe in Jesus Christ. All who believe in Jesus are heirs of the promise given to Abraham. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. Galatians 3:23-29. That is, through faith in Christ one becomes the spiritual seed of Abraham. Obedience to God is the result of salvation not the cause of it. Just as with Abraham, who believed God and it was accounted to him as righteousness, so too all others who believe God; it is also accounted unto them as righteousness.
|To read the entirety of Chapter
"Establishing Zionist Churches"
Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
2Th 2:3-4 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
1 John 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.